Catalonia: crisis puts the working class centre-stage

Seb Cooke argues that the level of ongoing mass struggle will determine the result of the current stand-off in Catalonia.

Catalonia independence

A pro-independence march in 2010 | CC by WikiCommons/amadalvarez

‘It was the red vision of the revolution, which, inevitably, would one day carry them all away, on some bloody evening at the century’s approaching end.’

This is how Emile Zola describes a march of striking miners from the viewpoint of the bourgeoisie in Germinal.

‘…There would be nothing left, not a sou of the great fortunes, not a title-deed of properties acquired, until the day dawned when a new earth would perhaps spring up once more. Yes, it was these things which were passing along the road, like the force of nature herself, and they were receiving the terrible wind of it in their faces.’

Zola’s novel, written in 1885, describes a revolutionary fervour gripping the working classes of the industrial world. This world of the capitalists is brutal and poverty-stricken. There is an undeniable thirst for change (‘the force of nature’) and they – the workers and the poor – are the ones who are going to bring it about, through a tremendous confrontation with the bourgeoisie.

One of the most powerful and successful mainstream arguments of the past 30 years has been that the age of revolution and class conflict is gone, as lifeless as Zola himself.

‘What we may be witnessing’,  wrote Francis Fukuyama in his 1989 essay The End of History, ‘…. [Is] the end point of mankind’s ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government.’

But we are now witnessing not the end of history, but what looks more like the end of Western liberal democracy. The words of Zola, which describe a world in crisis and a burning hunger for change, ring truer today than the predictions of Fukuyama writing over 100 years later.

This is because Western liberal democracy, or more accurately Western capitalism, has proved incapable of delivering on its promise of a better future. Far from historical questions being settled, the financial crash of 2008 and the ‘war on terror’ have led to a sharpening of social divisions. Questions of class, imperialism, self-determination, nationalism, fascism and racism have not remained hidden under the cloak of liberal democracy. Instead they have been brought to the fore.

We see this in Europe today. Across the continent, what Fukuyama described as ‘Western liberal democracy’ is facing a crisis of legitimacy. As a result, various forces are seeking to exploit the upheaval and associated political fallout.

Perhaps the place where we see currently the crisis at its sharpest is in the battle between the Spanish state and the independence movement in Catalonia.

Following a referendum that saw Catalan firefighters literally shielding people from Spanish police, the region erupted in a political general strike that has been described as on a scale ‘not seen since the struggles against the dictatorship of General Francisco Franco.’

This movement, and the violent backlash from the Spanish government, is opening up a space for different political forces that were supposed to be confined to the fringes in advanced capitalist states such as Spain. (This process began, of course, with the financial crisis of 2008, but the situation has advanced rapidly in the last fortnight.) The most important of these forces is the working class, expressed in the role of radical-left movements such as the anti-capitalist and pro-independence party Candidatura d’Unitat Popular (CUP).

But the crisis can also see a sudden radicalisation to the right, the extent of which will be determined by the outcome of the current battle over independence.

For fascists in Spain, who dream of fierce reaction against working-class democracy, the prospect of the Catalan independence movement being smashed by the Spanish state will be hugely appealing. And the threat issued this week – that Madrid would arrest the elected leader of Catalonia should he declare independence– will surely have been met with relish by those who see themselves as the heirs of Franco.

To arrest Carlos Puigdemont in such a way would have greatly legitimised and advanced fascist politics. This is because the fascistic idea that political power is ultimately won by extreme violence and force – in this case, wielded against a rebellious elected politician by the state – would have been turned into a reality. From there, it’s a much shorter step towards classic fascist forms of intimidation which aim to smash all forms of democracy: Nazi thugs attacking left-wing groups, gay clubs or mosques, for example. Suddenly, the possibility of recruiting people to such a movement on the back of reactionary politics would be boosted by the actions of the state.

This didn’t happen, of course, and Puigdemont wasn’t arrested – something that had more to do with the Catalan leader backing down than any restraint on the part of Mariano Rajoy.

This doesn’t mean that fascists have been prevented from capitalising on Rajoy’s actions, it just means that they have not been propelled forward by an immediate escalation from Madrid.

What happened instead on Tuesday was an attempt by Puigdemont to find a way out of the deadlock without confronting the enemies of the independence movement. This is short-sighted. The right will feel emboldened and the hard-line Francoists who have already been greatly enthused by Rajoy’s actions will look to capitalise on this.

Conversely, Puigdemont’s decision to suspend the effect of his declaration of independence may not have alleviated the crisis at all. In fact, having already taken a hard, authoritarian line against Catalonia, Rajoy has come back for more, declaring his intention to seize control of the region if the suspended declaration of independence is not withdrawn.

Had Puigdemont taken a more radical approach, the dynamic could have shifted more in the left’s favour.

A declaration of independence, coupled with a call for a mass mobilisation to defend the movement against central government, would have energised the base and drawn more people onto the streets. The right-wing Madrid government was openly worried about this, telling the Financial Times that the imposition of Article 155 (the law allowing Madrid to assume regional control) would be extremely risky given the potential for a popular backlash.

This didn’t happen, but going over what could have been is not just a theoretical exercise. It serves to highlight the power of the working class in this situation of crisis. That is to say that it was only through the mass defiance of Rajoy on October 1st and the general strike which followed that working-class people opened up the possibility of a far greater leap forward, towards not just independence but a challenge to capitalism more generally.

Having witnessed the leadership withdraw from the immediate radical demands of the base, the mass movement is faced with a choice: either move at the pace set by Puigdemont, or go beyond him and assert its own leadership of the situation.

Rajoy has laid down this ultimatum, and hopes for a further climb-down by Puigdemont. If the right felt emboldened following the statement on Tuesday, then they will be galvanised by further signs of weakness. The only thing stopping them will be the threat of another round of action by everyone from factory workers to football stars.

In other words, the next phase of the Catalan crisis, which also means the next phase of the Spanish and EU crisis, will not be decided by individuals in Brussels and Madrid but by the scale of revolt in Catalonia. And the outcome of the battle being waged, between the Spanish state and the EU on one side, and the October 1st movement and its international supporters on the other, will be determined by the strength of the left and the working class within that movement.

In the Communist Manifesto, written over 150 years ago, Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels wrote that ‘The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.’

That statement is as true today as it was then. The history of our current crisis will be written by the outcome of class struggle.

 

There is one comment

  1. marxistelf

    Why one might ask, having read the opinion piece, is it tagged below for “nationalism”? The word “nationalism” appears only once. In fact, we didn’t have one reference to nationalist but many to “fascist”, “revolution”, “class struggle” “Nazi” and “independence” etc. This would be rather like discussing the Egyptian Revolution, without a mention to the Muslim Brotherhood” and just one mention of islam or islamic and only talking about “imperialism”, class struggle, revolution etc. Oh well, no such thing as a pure revolution, we can all agree with that (I hope).
    However, I have indeed enlarged the photo and see no reference to class, anti-imperialism, poverty, anti-fascist struggle. Indeed, I don’t see any red flags or trade union banners, I only see Catalan flags.
    Now, I don’t deny the links to social class (though I would suggest they are way more complicated than appear here) and left-wing struggle (again more complicated here – with left wing groups actually standing with a counter demonstration for dialogue on 7th October, and- rather disturbingly – with a very large counter demonstration in defence of the Spanish constitution on 8th October).
    Again, I do not deny the power of the working class to defeat the Spanish State (with glimpses of that seen in the rather odd mix of general strike, demonstration and state departments and small business closures on the 3rd October) but would remind readers here that on the night of the declaration of Catalan Indendence, 30,000 gathered (of a population of 7, million) , safely away from the actual parliament, to herald the birth of a free nation. Again, no trade union banners, no red flags, or call for bread and peace, just Catalan flags and a giant telly sponsored by local small businesses.
    At the end of the night there were some disappointed people in that crowd but others took it on the chin. Meanwhile, inside the parliament some socialists sat silent because they were against the nationalist government and the referendum, others sat silent because they were against the nationalist government and supported a “proper referendum” while others sat silent because they had supported a minority government introducing a viscious budget for cuts in social provision(the other lefts voting it down) in return for independence and been betrayed. I wonder whether this latter left is who you think will now lead the masses on the streets.
    Food for thought.

Leave a Reply